Addressbook ordering erratic #1741

Open
opened 2021-03-07 17:24:05 +01:00 by PeterSurda · 0 comments
PeterSurda commented 2021-03-07 17:24:05 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I received a report that the addressbook ordering doesn't seem to follow usable rules, the person complaining doesn't like it. It looks like it's addresses first, then subscriptions, and spaces and digits are screwed up. There perhaps should be a way to choose the sorting order.

I received a report that the addressbook ordering doesn't seem to follow usable rules, the person complaining doesn't like it. It looks like it's addresses first, then subscriptions, and spaces and digits are screwed up. There perhaps should be a way to choose the sorting order.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2024-08-21#1741
No description provided.