From 65701e59975ccb199694c3168b61913f9fcc24e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Surda <surda@economicsofbitcoin.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:30:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] neededPubkeys fix

- was still using shared.neededPubkeys
---
 src/shared.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/shared.py b/src/shared.py
index f58a1cd6..54a9e750 100644
--- a/src/shared.py
+++ b/src/shared.py
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ def decryptAndCheckPubkeyPayload(data, address):
         encryptedData = data[readPosition:]
     
         # Let us try to decrypt the pubkey
-        toAddress, cryptorObject = shared.neededPubkeys[tag]
+        toAddress, cryptorObject = state.neededPubkeys[tag]
         if toAddress != address:
             logger.critical('decryptAndCheckPubkeyPayload failed due to toAddress mismatch. This is very peculiar. toAddress: %s, address %s' % (toAddress, address))
             # the only way I can think that this could happen is if someone encodes their address data two different ways.