"All accounts" shows that chan has new messages, but in the chan itself nothing is shown as new #884
Labels
No Label
bug
build
dependencies
developers
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
formatting
invalid
legal
mobile
obsolete
packaging
performance
protocol
question
refactoring
regression
security
test
translation
usability
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2024-12-04#884
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Icon counter also shows new messages.
This is the the current rev.
8e066ea
Can confirm this happens, even when every message has been read and trashed and there's no messages shown in the inbox.
The opposite also happens: the chan shows it has new messages but "All accounts" and icon indicator doesn't. Overall this problem became worse in
8e066ea
compared to 0.6.0.Ok I'll look at it.
@yurivict, @keithieopia, can you please check the latest v0.6? I hope #1117 fixed it.
Sorry, I can't check now due to ETOOBUSY.
@g1itch I just did a fresh
git clone
to get4a3f8f4
/ your #1117 pull request. Thank you for taking time time to address this issue despite it's age.IIRC, this issue on my end seemed to be intermittent but would happen at least once in 24 hours. At the time, I wasn't running
8e066ea
so it wasn't as frequent as yurivict reported.Let's give my new instance a max of 2 days running. I'm confident the issue would show up again in that time if it hasn't been successfully fixed. That said, your commit seems like pretty solid work. I see no reason why it wouldn't be fixed.
Please @ me here if I don't report back, so GitHub sends me a nag email.
I've had the client running for many hours and have gone through several rounds of new and deleted messages. It seems that the issue has been fixed thanks to thanks to @g1itch's work.
@PeterSurda, I feel this issue can be safely closed if @yurivict is still too busy to check.