Changes based on style and lint checks. Some empty docstrings remain … #1368
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "final_code_quality_10"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
…to be completed in the future. (final_code_quality_10)
Repository contributions to the PyBitmessage project
Code
Documentation
fab build_docs
successfully, ask for someone to run it against your branchTests
fab tests
successfully, ask for someone to run it against your branchTranslations
Gitiquette
addresses #123
orfixes #234
in your commit messagesUnused, unfinished and obsolete. Remove whole file.
@ -101,3 +125,4 @@
""""""
try:
data = unicode(data, 'utf-8')
except UnicodeDecodeError:
This may have changed in the meantime, please rebase so that I can see.
@ -242,4 +253,3 @@
reaper = []
for i in self.inboundConnections.values() + self.outboundConnections.values():
minTx = time.time() - 20
if i.fullyEstablished:
Since you refactored the cycle, you don't need reaper anymore, you can directly call
self.removeConnection(i)
. The reason why it's necessary to do it in two cycles is that you can't remove items from a dict while iterating it.@ -144,3 +172,4 @@
try:
if item.payload is None:
item.payload = self.getData(hashId)
except IOError:
@ -162,12 +193,14 @@ class FilesystemInventory(InventoryStorage):
return []
You can do a
for _, streamDict
instead of# pylint: disable=unused-variable
.Update docstrings etc.
+1 for ruthlessness :)
Rebased.
No,
helper_bootstrap.dns()
is above. That's enough.I'll accept it as it is now, it isn't a code quality issue, it can be changed in a separate PR.
@PeterSurda any PR makes no sense if changes reverted soon after merge.
I spent a week to find a proper way to check knownnodes actuality. If someone thinks I did it wrong, he should create a separate issue, not revert my changes in unrelated PR.
I don't have time to debug so let's go with what @g1itch said as he tested it. Please revert.
Please revert the changes as @g1itch said.
So, I removed line 160 which I guess must have been added by git during the rebase. All other active lines are as they were. If there's something else I'm supposed to have reverted, let me know.