Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-21
Archived
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 167 Pull Requests 54 Actions Packages Projects Releases 5 Wiki Activity

Any success in implementing PFS? #1601

New Issue
Open
opened 2020-02-11 15:45:44 +01:00 by PowerPress · 0 comments
PowerPress commented 2020-02-11 15:45:44 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Has anyone had any success in implementing PFS in bitmessage? Or any idea when it will arrive? It would provide a massive security boost.

Has anyone had any success in implementing PFS in bitmessage? Or any idea when it will arrive? It would provide a massive security boost.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working as it's supposed to
build
Related to building or build system
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
developers
The issue is relevant mainly for developers rather than users
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
New feature
formatting
Code or UI text formatting
invalid
legal
mobile
Frontend for mobile devices (kivy)
obsolete
packaging
performance
protocol
Protocol change
question
refactoring
regression
Some issue, fixed in the past, appears again
security
test
translation
usability
wontfix
No Label
enhancement
protocol
Milestone
No items
No Milestone v1.0.0
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
PeterSurda
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-21#1601
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?