Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-23
Archived
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 167 Pull Requests 54 Actions Packages Projects Releases 5 Wiki Activity

Not all invs relayed #1155

New Issue
Closed
opened 2018-03-13 15:07:17 +01:00 by PeterSurda · 4 comments
PeterSurda commented 2018-03-13 15:07:17 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
  • it looks like if a connection is established, it does not relay all invs, although the initial "big inv" seems to work correctly. You can reproduce it by using a trustedpeer, and after a couple of hours restart, new objects will show up for syncing
  • ACKs sent via Dandelion don't seem to enter stem phase correctly
  • it could also affect locally created objects
- it looks like if a connection is established, it does not relay all invs, although the initial "big inv" seems to work correctly. You can reproduce it by using a trustedpeer, and after a couple of hours restart, new objects will show up for syncing - ACKs sent via Dandelion don't seem to enter stem phase correctly - it could also affect locally created objects
g1itch commented 2019-07-22 13:32:10 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Was it fixed by #1483?

Was it fixed by #1483?
PeterSurda commented 2019-07-22 15:02:54 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Unfortunately I don't have a good way of testing it. I hope it was but I don't know for sure.

Unfortunately I don't have a good way of testing it. I hope it was but I don't know for sure.
navjotcis commented 2020-10-01 16:28:00 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I have tested it and I faced issues like some times the autoresponder does not reply and shows the status of waiting for the encryption key. I have wait for a couple of hours but I did not get the response so I think there are some issues with the autoresponder.

I have tested it and I faced issues like some times the autoresponder does not reply and shows the status of waiting for the encryption key. I have wait for a couple of hours but I did not get the response so I think there are some issues with the autoresponder.
PeterSurda commented 2024-06-11 11:02:44 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Doesn't seem to be happening anymore, was probably fixed in #1483

Doesn't seem to be happening anymore, was probably fixed in #1483
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working as it's supposed to
build
Related to building or build system
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
developers
The issue is relevant mainly for developers rather than users
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
New feature
formatting
Code or UI text formatting
invalid
legal
mobile
Frontend for mobile devices (kivy)
obsolete
packaging
performance
protocol
Protocol change
question
refactoring
regression
Some issue, fixed in the past, appears again
security
test
translation
usability
wontfix
No Label
bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone v0.6.4
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
PeterSurda
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-23#1155
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?