Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-26
Archived
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 167 Pull Requests 56 Actions Packages Projects Releases 5 Wiki Activity

sock.sendall function isn't atomic #590

New Issue
Closed
opened 2013-12-13 19:05:59 +01:00 by Atheros1 · 0 comments
Atheros1 commented 2013-12-13 19:05:59 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

It is causing inv messages and presumably occasionally other types of messages to fail the checksum.

https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=3431.0

It is causing inv messages and presumably occasionally other types of messages to fail the checksum. https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=3431.0
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working as it's supposed to
build
Related to building or build system
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
developers
The issue is relevant mainly for developers rather than users
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
New feature
formatting
Code or UI text formatting
invalid
legal
mobile
Frontend for mobile devices (kivy)
obsolete
packaging
performance
protocol
Protocol change
question
refactoring
regression
Some issue, fixed in the past, appears again
security
test
translation
usability
wontfix
No Label
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
PeterSurda
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2025-02-26#590
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?