Added flatpak build manifests with split dependencies #1768
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
bug
build
dependencies
developers
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
formatting
invalid
legal
mobile
obsolete
packaging
performance
protocol
question
refactoring
regression
security
test
translation
usability
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Bitmessage/PyBitmessage-2024-12-09#1768
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "kdcis/v0.6-flatpak"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Added Flatpak build manifests under
packages/flatpak/
directoryAdded Flatpak build instructions under
docs/
directoryyou can put lines 53 and 54 together
Please update documentation
@ -0,0 +4,4 @@
First make sure you have `flatpak` and `flatpak-builder` installed along with these dependencies (Ubuntu 20.4) `git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common` needs to be installed.
Follow the instructions for your distribution on [flathub](https://flatpak.org/setup/). The instructions there only cover the installation of `flatpak`, but
`flatpak-builder` should be the same.
these are the packages (ubuntu 20.04) that need to be installed:
flatpak flatpak-builder git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
Maybe also add this into index.rst with mdinclude? Under new section, like
Or into README.md?
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
Okay
@ -0,0 +4,4 @@
First make sure you have `flatpak` and `flatpak-builder` installed along with these dependencies (Ubuntu 20.4) `git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common` needs to be installed.
Follow the instructions for your distribution on [flathub](https://flatpak.org/setup/). The instructions there only cover the installation of `flatpak`, but
`flatpak-builder` should be the same.
Okay, I'll update the documentation
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
Quick amendment: include a link to it, not the content, as mdinclude does, I'd mistaken.
InputError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '../../../../../../checkouts/latest/docs/..Flatpak_Build.md'.
Raw: https://readthedocs.org/api/v2/build/14080458.txt
I meant something like this: https://pybitmessage-test.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#build-instructions
Did it with these changes: 0bedc5d
Qt4, it is not QuickTime
Also, I don't get a point of documenting the maintenance tasks in such way. Why don't you just make a script
buildscripts/flatpak.sh
covering the steps under the##Export
header?There supposed to be a builder on
https://git.bitmessage.org/Bitmessage
for building and uploading the bundle, which will be used as github check for a new code, likebuildbot/PyBitmessage-wine32
andbuildbot/dpkg
.@g1itch I'm working on the buildbot integration.
Clean up, rebase and then I'll look at it again.
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
## Requirements
First make sure you have `flatpak` and `flatpak-builder` installed along with these dependencies (Ubuntu 20.4) `git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common` needs to be installed.
line too long
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
## Requirements
First make sure you have `flatpak` and `flatpak-builder` installed along with these dependencies (Ubuntu 20.4) `git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common` needs to be installed.
As it is a readme file, I don't think there would be any pylint line too long warning will happen.
Please confirm if still I need to break it.
I think we can merge it, the buildbot integration can be deployed later.
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
# PyBitmessage Linux flatpak instructions
## Requirements
First make sure you have `flatpak` and `flatpak-builder` installed along with these dependencies (Ubuntu 20.4) `git xz-utils elfutils librsvg2-common` needs to be installed.
I don't have a strong opinion so we can probably just leave it as it is.