Fix some typos #822

Closed
henrikolsson wants to merge 1 commits from typo_fixes into master
henrikolsson commented 2015-11-08 21:49:36 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Fixes a few typos :)

Fixes a few typos :)
PeterSurda commented 2015-11-08 21:51:19 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Thank you,

I am developing on another fork, I'll merge it there and later it will make it into official PyBitmessage.

Thank you, I am developing on another fork, I'll merge it there and later it will make it into official PyBitmessage.
JoshuaMurphynz commented 2015-11-08 21:51:54 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Damn you're fast ;)
On 9 Nov 2015 09:51, "Peter Šurda" notifications@github.com wrote:

Thank you,

I am developing on another fork, I'll merge it there and later it will
make it into official PyBitmessage.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage/pull/822#issuecomment-154869295
.

Damn you're fast ;) On 9 Nov 2015 09:51, "Peter Šurda" notifications@github.com wrote: > Thank you, > > I am developing on another fork, I'll merge it there and later it will > make it into official PyBitmessage. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage/pull/822#issuecomment-154869295 > .
henrikolsson commented 2015-11-08 22:07:57 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Cool, I saw your reference to https://github.com/mailchuck/PyBitmessage in another pull request. Is that the fork you're talking about? Will it replace this codebase?

Cool, I saw your reference to https://github.com/mailchuck/PyBitmessage in another pull request. Is that the fork you're talking about? Will it replace this codebase?
PeterSurda commented 2015-11-09 08:17:59 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Is that the fork you're talking about?

Yes.

Will it replace this codebase?

Mostly, yes. Almost all commits to that fork will be merged here within the next month or two. With respect to this request, I don't see anything that would be incompatible. If you want, you can make a pull request against that one to speed up the workflow, however I would ask you to PGP sign your commit. Otherwise I have to pull it locally and sign myself.

> Is that the fork you're talking about? Yes. > Will it replace this codebase? Mostly, yes. Almost all commits to that fork will be merged here within the next month or two. With respect to this request, I don't see anything that would be incompatible. If you want, you can make a pull request against that one to speed up the workflow, however I would ask you to PGP sign your commit. Otherwise I have to pull it locally and sign myself.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
No description provided.